[MEI-L] Beat in 6/8
Eleanor Selfridge-Field
esfield at stanford.edu
Thu Aug 27 01:08:26 CEST 2015
To pick up threads from Don's and Laurent's posts, the main reason MuseData allows a double representation in certain rhythmic situations is precisely because in eighteenth-century music the logic of written notation and the logic of sound-oriented files such as MIDI simply do not coincide.
Some instructive instances occur in Corelli--e.g. in movements in compound meter (6/8, 12/8), where active parts such as violins maintain a running series of eighth notes grouped conventionally by threes, but the accompanying bass parts are notated in C (common time) and the units are undotted quarter notes.
In Bach, a common situation involves a beamed group consisting of a dotted quarter followed by three (or five) thirty-seconds (i.e., non-binary subdivisions). The values in performances are subject to interpretation.
In short, it does not take an irregular meter to produce irregular groupings or "illegal" polyphonic alignments.
Eleanor
Eleanor Selfridge-Field
Consulting Professor, Music
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-3076, USA
esfield at stanford.edu <mailto:esfield at stanford.edu>
Profile: https://profiles.stanford.edu/eleanor-selfridge-field
-----Original Message-----
From: mei-l [mailto:mei-l-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de] On Behalf Of Byrd, Donald A.
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 7:03 AM
To: Music Encoding Initiative
Subject: Re: [MEI-L] Beat in 6/8
Executive summary: In 6/8 specifically, I think it should be a dotted quarter, not an eighth. Now some discussion of the issues:
I think most of us would agree that whether the beat is an 8th or a dotted quarter in 6/8 (or 9/8, 12/8, etc.) depends mostly on the tempo, but I doubt if we want to infer that from metronome marks, much less verbal tempo indications! FWIW, I'd guess the dotted-quarter beat is more common.
Of course the same question arises in compound meters with denominators other than 8. Is the beat in 9/16 a 16th or a dotted 8th? It even worse in irregular meters. In 5/8, a measure might have five beats of an 8th each, or a quarter followed by a dotted quarter, or a dotted quarter followed by a quarter!
But in _Behind Bars_, p. 230, Gould solves the problem in terms of notation with the rule that a single diagonal line means to repeat the previous beamed group of total duration of a quarter (or dotted quarter), two diagonal lines a duration of an 8th (or dotted 8th), three diagonal lines a duration of… You get the idea. So, while she calls these beat repeats, she defines them in terms of beaming! But of course she's talking about usage for new scores, not what appears in Weber or Beethoven or whever's manuscripts!
--Don
On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:22 AM, Laurent Pugin <lxpugin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking at beat repeats (<beatRpt>) and I am not sure how to deal with them in 6/8 (or 9/8, etc). Defining the beat in 6/8 is a recurrent issue. Looking at timestamps, it seems that each 8th has to be considered as a beat. But in the beatRpt examples in the guidelines it seems that a 4.th is considered as a beat.
>
> Considering that the number of slashes have to be encoded in the @rend attribute, rendering the beat repeats properly is not that much of an issue because we could just ignore the beat duration and just display the dashes. (Only rendering repeats of mixed duration values would be an issue since it is not clear how this has to be encoded.) However, this would not work if we need to align them with other voices, for example. Any recommendation on this particular issue (<beatRpt>) and on how to consider beats in 6/8 in general?
>
> Best,
> Laurent
> _______________________________________________
> mei-l mailing list
> mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
> https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l
---
Donald Byrd
Woodrow Wilson Indiana Teaching Fellow
Adjunct Associate Professor of Informatics Visiting Scientist, Research Technologies Indiana University Bloomington
_______________________________________________
mei-l mailing list
mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l
More information about the mei-l
mailing list