[MEI-L] Tick-based Timing
James Ingram
j.ingram at netcologne.de
Wed Apr 14 21:49:00 CEST 2021
Last January, I raised an issue about Tick-based Timing in the W3C Music
Notation Community Group's MNX Repository [1], but it was closed in
February without my being satisfied that it had been sufficiently discussed.
I had the feeling that something important was being glossed over, so
have been thinking hard about the subject over the past few weeks, and
have now uploaded an article about it to my website [2].
My conclusions are that Tick-based Timing
* has to do with the difference between absolute (mechanical,
physical) time and performance practice,
* is relevant to the encoding of /*all*/ the world's event-based music
notations, not just CWMN1900.
* needs to be considered for the next generation of music encoding formats
I would especially like to get some feedback from those working on
non-western notations, so am posting this not only to the W3C MNCG's
public mailing list, but also to MEI's.
All the best,
James Ingram
(notator)
[1] MNX Issue #217: https://github.com/w3c/mnx/issues/217
[2]
https://james-ingram-act-two.de/writings/TickBasedTiming/tickBasedTiming.html
--
https://james-ingram-act-two.de
https://github.com/notator
email signature
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.uni-paderborn.de/pipermail/mei-l/attachments/20210414/2e3d7d5d/attachment.htm>
More information about the mei-l
mailing list