[MEI-L] App within verse

[Laurent Pugin]

Hi Perry,

Thanks for the reply. None of them seem to be a good reason to me ;-)
However, I can still see your points and I can leave without it.

Laurent

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Roland, Perry D. (pdr4h) <
pdr4h at eservices.virginia.edu> wrote:

>
>
> Briefly --
>
>
>
> Not necessarily good reasons, but considerations nonetheless --
>
>
>
> 1. no one asked,
>
> 2. difficult to translate for current (non-MEI-supporting) software,
>
> 3. avoidance of making <app> and <rdg> “catch-all” containers -- that is,
> allowing <app> to appear nearly everywhere and letting <rdg> contain nearly
> everything.
>
>
>
> --
>
> p.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* mei-l [mailto:mei-l-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de] *On Behalf Of
> *Laurent Pugin
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 18, 2015 9:44 AM
> *To:* MEI-list
> *Subject:* [MEI-L] App within verse
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Is there any particular reason why /app is not allowed within /verse? I
> could do:
>
>
>
> /app
>
>   /rdg
>
>     /verse
>
>       /syl
>
>   /rdg
>
>     /verse
>
>       /syl
>
>
>
> But since the verse is the same in my case, I would instinctively do:
>
>
>
> /verse
>
>   /app
>
>     /rdg
>
>       /syl
>
>     /rdg
>
>       /syl
>
>
>
> Laurent
>
> _______________________________________________
> mei-l mailing list
> mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
> https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.uni-paderborn.de/pipermail/mei-l/attachments/20150219/211aab15/attachment.html>