[MEI-L] Order of Guidelines chapters

[Kristina Richts]

And one more vote for option b!

Best,
Kristina


Am 11.05.2013 09:54, schrieb Maja Hartwig:
> I also prefer option b!
> Maja
> *Gesendet:* Samstag, 11. Mai 2013 um 09:45 Uhr
> *Von:* "Laurent Pugin" <laurent at music.mcgill.ca>
> *An:* "Music Encoding Initiative" <mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de>
> *Betreff:* Re: [MEI-L] Order of Guidelines chapters
> b too,
> Laurent
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Byrd, Donald A. <donbyrd at indiana.edu> 
> wrote:
>
>     I vote for b also. I think the argument for backward compatibility
>     of chapter numbers is pretty weak.
>
>     --Don
>
>
>
>     On Fri, 10 May 2013 21:47:03 +0000, Tore Simonsen
>     <Tore.Simonsen at nmh.no> wrote:
>
>         Hah, one of the few things I feel I might have an opinion of!
>
>         As a fairly new reader I would prefer b)
>
>         All the best
>
>         Tore Simonsen
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: mei-l-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de
>         [mailto:mei-l-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de] On Behalf Of
>         Johannes
>         Kepper
>         Sent: 10. mai 2013 23:20
>         To: Music Encoding Initiative
>         Subject: [MEI-L] Order of Guidelines chapters
>
>         Dear list,
>
>         while preparing the documentation for the upcoming release of
>         MEI, we
>         stumbled upon an issue where we would like to get some
>         feedback from
>         the community.
>
>         The next release release includes a new module in MEI
>         (FRBR...), and
>         we wondered about the preferences for ordering. It would make
>         a lot
>         of sense to put the new chapter next to the existing header
>         chapter,
>         but as all chapters are automatically numbered, this would
>         result in
>         different chapter numbers for almost the complete Guidelines
>         of the
>         new release, compared to the 2012 release. My question is: Do you
>         prefer
>
>         a) to keep existing chapter numbers whenever possible, or
>
>         b) to have chapters organized by their relationship, ignoring
>         changing numbers?
>
>
>         Technically, it is not a big deal to implement it either way.
>         I have
>         a slight preference for b), but am open to arguments from both
>         sides.
>         There isn't much time left for discussion, so if you have strong
>         opinions, please respond before Monday.
>
>         Best,
>         Johannes
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         mei-l mailing list
>         mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
>         https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l
>
>
>     --
>     Donald Byrd
>     Woodrow Wilson Indiana Teaching Fellow
>     Adjunct Associate Professor of Informatics
>     Visiting Scientist, Research Technologies
>     Indiana University Bloomington
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     mei-l mailing list
>     mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
>     https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mei-l mailing list
> mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
> https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l

-- 
Kristina Richts M.A.
DFG/NEH-Projekt "Digital Music Notation Data Model and Prototype Delivery System"

Musikwissenschaftliches Seminar Detmold/Paderborn
Gartenstraße 20
D-32756 Detmold

Tel.: +49 5231 975676
Mail: richts at music-encoding.org
URL: http://music-encoding.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.uni-paderborn.de/pipermail/mei-l/attachments/20130511/af1b4a43/attachment.html>