[MEI-L] analysis

[Roland, Perry (pdr4h)]

Johannes,

Your argument is convincing.

But, there's also the possibility of moving @mfunc to an element similar to <harm>.  Of course, this would require more extended planning and execution.

--
p.


__________________________
Perry Roland
Music Library
University of Virginia
P. O. Box 400175
Charlottesville, VA 22904
434-982-2702 (w)
pdr4h (at) virginia (dot) edu
________________________________________
From: mei-l-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de [mei-l-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de] on behalf of Johannes Kepper [kepper at edirom.de]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 4:30 PM
To: Music Encoding Initiative
Subject: Re: [MEI-L] analysis

Hi both,

I would argue that for consistency's sake we should add @hfunc to chords. If one does his analysis using this attribute on notes, why should he switch to <harm> on chords?

jo


Am 23.04.2012 um 21:11 schrieb Roland, Perry (pdr4h):

> Hi, Maja,
>
> We could add @hfunc to <chord>, but I've always thought that it would duplicate the function of <harm>, which is to assign harmonic labels.  I could be wrong though, if <harm> were defined only to be used for transcription and not analysis.  Anyone else have thoughts on this?
>
> --
> p.
>
>
> __________________________
> Perry Roland
> Music Library
> University of Virginia
> P. O. Box 400175
> Charlottesville, VA 22904
> 434-982-2702 (w)
> pdr4h (at) virginia (dot) edu
> From: mei-l-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de [mei-l-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de] on behalf of Maja Hartwig [maja.hartwig at gmx.de]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:33 AM
> To: Music Encoding Initiative
> Subject: [MEI-L] analysis
>
> Dear List,
>
> writing the guidelines of the analysis module, I am wondering about the use of the @hfunc.
> It is allowed within a <note> for describing a note as a "keynote" or "root" or anything else.
> But the @hfunc is not permitted wtihin the <chord>, although the @mfunc e.g. is allowed.
> In my opinion it would make sense to use the @hfunc also on chords for describing the function of it
> in a musical work, such as a "tonic" or something like that.
> So I think the att.chord.anl should be memberOf att.harmonicfunction.
> Is it a bug or any other opinions?
>
> Best regards,
> Maja
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mei-l mailing list
> mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
> https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l


_______________________________________________
mei-l mailing list
mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l