[MEI-L] clef as milestone element
Maja Hartwig
maja.hartwig at gmx.de
Tue May 31 08:11:41 CEST 2011
Hi Andrew!
We think you are right, that a clefchange makes no sense within this context.
Did you already tried this solution?
<measure>
<staff>
<layer>
<note/>
<sb/>
<staffgrp>
<staffdef>
<clef line="2" shape="G"/>
</staffdef>
</staffgrp>
<note/>
</layer>
</staff>
</measure>
Nothing against crazy solutions ;-), but in our opinion, allowing <clef> within <sb> is not the best way to encode this, because <sb> applies only the layout as you said, but the <clef> should be regarded as an independent element. If the clef appears in the second measure after a systembreak e.g, you have to indicate that, too, but it has nothing to do with a <sb>.
<measure n="1"/>
<sb/>
<measure n="2"/>
<measure n="3">
<staffgrp>
<staffdef n="1" clef.line="2" clef.shape="G"/>
</staffgrp>
<staff n="1">
<layer>
<note/>
</layer>
</staff>
</measure>
We would prefer to keep it within <staffdef>.
Best,
Kristina and Maja
Am 31.05.2011 um 01:18 schrieb Andrew Hankinson, Mr:
> Hi all,
>
> tl;dr Should clefs be considered a milestone element?
>
> The <clef> element in MEI is currently only allowed within <clefchange> and <staffdef> elements. I can understand why, since <staff> is supposed to reflect musical linearity and not be affected by system breaks, which is more a physical artifact of page layout. So, a <clef> should only occur if a) it's part of the staff definition, or b) it's changing.
>
> *However*, an interesting question comes up when encoding clefs at the beginning of systems. Currently, the only way to encode this is to wrap a <clef> in a <clefchange>, but for most of the time, it's not actually changing; it's only a "courtesy" clef.
>
> So, to give an example. Suppose the following:
>
> <staff n="1">
> <layer n="1">
> <sb n="1"/>
> <clef line="3" shape="F"/>
> <note pname="f" oct="3"/>
> <note pname="g" oct="3"/>
> ...
> <sb n="2" />
> <clef line="3" shape="F"/>
> <note pname="c" oct="3"/>
> <note pname="d" oct="3"/>
>
> ...etc...
>
> This is currently invalid MEI, but I'm not really sure how to capture the clefs at the beginning of each system without a) incorporating them into a <clefchange> (semantically wrong), b) allowing <clef> directly within layer, or (really crazy) c) changing <sb> to include clef information (e.g., allow <clef> within <sb>, and/or add @clef.shape and @clef.line directly on <sb>.
>
> What I'd like to suggest is option b), but I'm sure there's a very good reason why I'm wrong. :)
>
> -Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> mei-l mailing list
> mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
> https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l
-------------- n?chster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt...
URL: <http://lists.uni-paderborn.de/pipermail/mei-l/attachments/20110531/59ccd24f/attachment.htm>
More information about the mei-l
mailing list