[mei-catalog-ig] Persistent identifier for digital music editions

[Peter Stadler]

I like persistent identifiers because it promises persistence to the user :)
It signals that this edition is there to stay and some people (or institution) do care about it.

Which sort of (technical) system to implement? I don’t know …

Best
Peter

> Am 15.11.2018 um 10:17 schrieb Norbert Dubowy Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum <dubowy at mozarteum.at>:
> 
> ​Dear metadata and cataloging IG,
> As we are close to publishing our first set of digital editions, I would like to hear your opinion on the following subject: Does it make sense to provide a persistent identifier with the edition (in the individual file / MEI header)? What is the benefit, and is there any preference of what kind of identifier (DOI, or urn, or ...) to use in the case of a strictly digital music edition (no hybrid edition, not the rendering, just the coding)?
> 
> Thanks,
> N.
> 
> 
> Dr. Norbert Dubowy
> Mozart-Institut/Digitale Mozart-Edition
> Cheflektor/Managing Editor
> Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum
> Schwarzstr. 26
> 5020 Salzburg, Austria
> T +43 (0) 662 889 40 66
> F +43 (0) 662 889 40 68
> E dubowy at mozarteum.at
> www.mozarteum.at
> 
> Newsletter Stiftung Mozarteum
> Facebook Stiftung Mozarteum
> ZVR: 438729131, UID: ATU33977907
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mei-catalog-ig mailing list
> mei-catalog-ig at lists.uni-paderborn.de
> https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-catalog-ig

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.uni-paderborn.de/pipermail/mei-catalog-ig/attachments/20181119/07627ace/attachment.sig>