[MEI-L] About listing 128 in MEI Guidelines 5.0

Andrew Hankinson andrew.hankinson at rism.digital
Fri Feb 9 13:45:41 CET 2024


Hi Guillermo,

Could you please include a link to the problem that you’re seeing? Thanks.

Andrew

> On 9 Feb 2024, at 12:56, Guille Martín Hidalgo <martinguillermo719 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi to all the community! I'm delighted to have joined you all. 
> 
> I'm starting to read and study the guidelines, and I think something seems odd in listing 128. I'm not sure if it's me not understanding how it works. 
> 
> Firstly, the numbering scheme of the measures seems disorganized to me (the first measure is labeled as "1," the second as "4," then after the three rest measures, the next one is labeled as "5"...). Secondly, regarding the accidentals in the first chord, why is C flat? And finally, why is it possible to hold a whole chord in the third measure within a "cut" measure bar?
> 
> Thanks and kind regards,
> 
> Guillermo M
> _______________________________________________
> mei-l mailing list
> mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
> https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l



More information about the mei-l mailing list