[mei-neumes-ig] A draft for the new Neumes Module schema
Roland, Perry D. (pdr4h)
pdr4h at eservices.virginia.edu
Fri May 26 15:44:29 CEST 2017
Thomas,
What if we added “u” (for unspecified) to the list of values for @quilisma and @oriscus?
Would the same thing need to be done for other attributes of <nc>, i.e., @curved, @diagonal, @connection?
--
p.
From: Roland, Perry D. (pdr4h)
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 12:02 PM
To: 'Neumes Interest Group of the Music Encoding Initiative' <mei-neumes-ig at lists.uni-paderborn.de>
Subject: RE: [mei-neumes-ig] A draft for the new Neumes Module schema
Hi Thomas,
Mixing primitive datatypes; that is, “true|false|2|3”, creates a number of issues that I’d like to avoid. But there are other options –
1. creating, as you suggest, two attributes each for quilisma and orisicus: quilisima and quilisma.form and orisicus and oriscus.form,
2. promoting @quilisma and @oriscus to element status and giving them attributes to describe their visual qualities,
3. creation of a customization for your project that substitutes “true|false” for “2|3” in the official schema.
We explored the 2nd possibility in Tours, but I’m not convinced that’s the best path because it creates inconsistency by promoting some attributes of <nc> but not others. Also, are we likely to have the same issue with other attributes of <nc>? For instance, should the presence of a diagonalright (whatever that is) be separate from whether it’s pointing up or down? So, I’m inclined toward the 3rd option.
Adding @strophicus is simple, but what should its values be? True/false, like oriscus, etc. or something else?
To deal with pitch, we decided to add @pname and @oct on <nc>, but I’d like to hear why you think adding <note> inside <nc> is preferable.
I’m confused with regard to one of your suggestions about <accid>. You want <accid> to appear between <neume> elements and that’s exactly where they can currently occur, but that makes them children of <syllable>, which you say you don’t want. Once you’ve cleared that up, adding <accid> as a child of <neume> isn’t a problem.
Likewise, adding <rubric> poses no problems. It should also come in handy for mensural notation.
--
p.
From: mei-neumes-ig [mailto:mei-neumes-ig-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de] On Behalf Of Thomas Weber
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 10:32 AM
To: Neumes Interest Group of the Music Encoding Initiative <mei-neumes-ig at lists.uni-paderborn.de<mailto:mei-neumes-ig at lists.uni-paderborn.de>>
Subject: Re: [mei-neumes-ig] A draft for the new Neumes Module schema
Dear list,
because Elaine and me aren't in Tours, we looked through the draft together and would like to give our input for the upcoming meeting. From the perspective of Corpus monodicum, this definitely is heading in the right direction. There are some changes we'd suggest:
* Quilisma/Oriscus: So far, we've only encoded whether something is or is not an oriscus or quilisma - i.e. no more detailed information about the shape. The project won't change that, so we'd like to suggest to also offer a simple "true/false" option, like with @episima. Mixing boolean and numbers is a little odd, but the alternative would be two separate attributes, which wouldn't be any handier.
* We'd suggest a strophicus attribute. Strophici could be handled using taxonomies, but they are so common that we think they deserve their own attribute, just like oriscus and quilisma.
* We'd need <note> inside <nc> to encode pitch information for diastematic notation - or alternatively, @pname/@oct on <nc>. <note> is probably preferable.
* Currently, you can put <accid> inside <syllable>. I don't think this is the appropriate place to put an accidental. We have two situations where we have to deal with accidentals:
* Accidentals that are "attached to" a neume. It would make most sense if they were child elements of that <neume> element.
* Accidentals that are not attached to a neume, i.e. sort-of-but-not-quite key signatures. To use the currently allowed <keySig> (inside <staffDef>) in these situations doesn't seem appropriate. It would suggest that use and implications of these accidentals are identical to modern key signatures, which as far as I understand is not the case - or we lack that knowledge. It would be useful to put them right between the <neume> elements - most of the time (but not always) immediately after a <sb>.
* We need to encode rubrics and would introduce a <rubric> element inside <layer>, ideally with a @type attribute that might be an open list with suggested values feast (e.g. for a rubric "De Sancto Stephano"), service (e.g. for a rubric "Ad summam missam") and genre (e.g. for a rubric "Alleluia").
During the last meeting in Tübingen, the <syllable> element was challenged. I think one motivation was to make the hierarchy of the neumes and mensural modules more compatible for projects that have to deal with both. We can't say a lot about that, though.
To everybody in Tours: Have a great un-conference day!
Thomas
Am 11.05.2017 um 09:26 schrieb Ichiro Fujinaga, Prof.:
Dear List,
Perry Roland has kindly worked on a new version of the MEI Neumes Module schema.
This was based on my suggestions, which were based on the discussions at the last MEI Neumes Interest Group (19 November 2016, Tübingen) and at various Cantus Ultimus meetings.
I hope this will be a staring point for fruitful discussions on this list and at the upcoming Neumes Interest Group meeting in Tours on Friday 19 May.
Attached are an ODD file with Perry’s comments at the bottom; an RNG file; and a test MEI file. All provided by Perry.
Below is what I provided to Perry.
================================
A <neume> element consists of one or more <neumeComponent> element(s).
A <neumeComponent> is a single pitched event, although the exact pitch may not be known.
Attributes for <neume>
@direction (relative to the previous <neume>) {N|S|L|H|SH|SL}
N: neutral or unknown
H: higher
L: lower
S: same
SH: same or higher (but not lower)
SL: same or lower (but not higher)
@significative letters
@hispanicLoop (not sure about this)
Attributes for <neumeComponent>
@direction: pitch relative to the previous pitch (<neumeComponent>) within the same <neume> {N|S|L|H|SH|SL}
N: neutral or unknown
H: higher
L: lower
S: same or unison
SH: same or higher (but not lower)
SL: same or lower (but not higher)
@wavy
@curved (anticlockwise, clockwise)
@angled
@episma
@flat
@jagged
@liquescence
@extended
@diagonal right (up or down)
@quilisma (2 or 3 curves)
@long
@oriscus (curved, flat, jagged)
@connection (gapped, looped) (to the previous neumeComponent within the same <neume>)
================================
Ichiro
_______________________________________________
mei-neumes-ig mailing list
mei-neumes-ig at lists.uni-paderborn.de<mailto:mei-neumes-ig at lists.uni-paderborn.de>
https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-neumes-ig
--
Notengrafik Berlin GmbH
HRB 15007
UstID: DE 289234097
Geschäftsführer:
Thomas Weber und Werner J. Wolff
fon: +49 30 220661685
Leuschnerdamm 13
10999 Berlin
notengrafik.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.uni-paderborn.de/pipermail/mei-neumes-ig/attachments/20170526/738419f9/attachment.html>
More information about the mei-neumes-ig
mailing list