[MEI-L] Do we have to call it "MEI Go!"?
andrew.hankinson at mail.mcgill.ca
Wed Mar 22 16:22:47 CET 2017
The last thing I would want to do is shut down a constructive conversation, but I believe thread has drifted into bikeshed* territory. I also don't think we'll resolve it over e-mail; at least not in this way.
As far as I'm concerned, MEI Go! has been a code-name that was suggested at last year's unconference meeting. It is, and has been, just a way of referring to a simpler version of MEI intended for wider adoption, and isn't a 'fait accompli'. Suggestions and critique are welcome, but rattling off messages with no attempt at organizing them and seeking consensus on a single name isn't really going to result in anything better.
So perhaps someone with an interest in helping our community choose a great name can compile a list of the suggestions that have been made, and/or set up a Doodle poll link with write-in space for suggestions? That would save a lot of time and energy (and inbox space).
> On 22 Mar 2017, at 23:59, Thomas Weber <tw at notabit.eu> wrote:
> Am 22.03.2017 um 15:09 schrieb Byrd, Donald A.:
>> I like MEI Presto! MEI Core is good, too: more descriptive, though much less musical. --DAB
> I'd prefer descriptive over musical.
> Anyway, a slightly more descriptive musical suggestion: MEI c.f. (for cantus firmus - i.e. the most important and lasting parts)
> mei-l mailing list
> mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
More information about the mei-l