[MEI-L] App within verse

[Christine Siegert]

I would like to support the idea to allow <app> within <verse>, simply 
because of logical reasons. In most cases, it won't be the verse that 
differs, but the syllable within the verse.
Christine



Prof. Dr. Christine Siegert
Universität der Künste Berlin
Fakultät Musik, Musikwissenschaft
Fasanenstraße 1B
D-10623 Berlin

Tel.: +49 (0)30 3185 2318
siegert at udk-berlin.de
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
From: Johannes Kepper
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 5:51 PM
To: Music Encoding Initiative
Subject: Re: [MEI-L] App within verse

I think Laurent's request is perfectly reasonable. We cannot prevent abuse 
of app/rdg and annot in the regular schema. If we really want to do that, it 
has to be done with Schematron anyway. I strongly support to include app 
within verse, and have thus opened a ticket for it.

Johannes


Am 19.02.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Roland, Perry D. (pdr4h) 
<pdr4h at eservices.virginia.edu>:

>
> Like I said, these are not necessarily good reasons for not allowing it 
> and I didn’t intend to imply that your suggestion for change is not a good 
> one.  I was simply providing some background while trying to keep my 
> response short.  Feel free to create a ticket in the Google Code repo.
>
> --
> p.
>
>
> From: mei-l [mailto:mei-l-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de] On Behalf Of 
> Laurent Pugin
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:43 AM
> To: Music Encoding Initiative
> Subject: Re: [MEI-L] App within verse
>
> Hi Perry,
>
> Thanks for the reply. None of them seem to be a good reason to me ;-) 
> However, I can still see your points and I can leave without it.
>
> Laurent
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Roland, Perry D. (pdr4h) 
> <pdr4h at eservices.virginia.edu> wrote:
>
> Briefly --
>
> Not necessarily good reasons, but considerations nonetheless --
>
> 1. no one asked,
> 2. difficult to translate for current (non-MEI-supporting) software,
> 3. avoidance of making <app> and <rdg> “catch-all” containers -- that is, 
> allowing <app> to appear nearly everywhere and letting <rdg> contain 
> nearly everything.
>
> --
> p.
>
>
>
> From: mei-l [mailto:mei-l-bounces at lists.uni-paderborn.de] On Behalf Of 
> Laurent Pugin
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 9:44 AM
> To: MEI-list
> Subject: [MEI-L] App within verse
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any particular reason why /app is not allowed within /verse? I 
> could do:
>
> /app
>   /rdg
>     /verse
>       /syl
>   /rdg
>     /verse
>       /syl
>
> But since the verse is the same in my case, I would instinctively do:
>
> /verse
>   /app
>     /rdg
>       /syl
>     /rdg
>       /syl
>
> Laurent
>
> _______________________________________________
> mei-l mailing list
> mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
> https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mei-l mailing list
> mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
> https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l


_______________________________________________
mei-l mailing list
mei-l at lists.uni-paderborn.de
https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-l