<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div></div>
<div>How does this function in other repertoires where hooks and loops are not a part of the shape?</div>
<div><br>
On 21 Jun 2018, at 16:56, Kate Helsen <<a href="mailto:katehelsen@gmail.com">katehelsen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Looking at the adiastematic neumes in Hartker, I would say that liquescence is a way of rendering an <nc> that would otherwise (by "default") look a different way. I think this means it is naturally described at the
<u>attribute</u> level.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In this type of notation I would start with liquescent <u>forms</u> such as: "curled" and "hoop" - to indicate that the curl has closed all the way into a sort of circle." </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The <u>placement</u> of these liquescents is usually at the 'end' of the note (so often "ne") but sometimes they at at the "se" - it depends on the shape of the rest of the neume. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>One might also want to think about <u>direction</u> of the "curl" - 95% of the time I'd say that it's clockwise, but there the torculus resupinus liquescent bucks the trend by going the other way... </div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 11:23 Micah John Walter <<a href="mailto:micahjwalter@gmail.com">micahjwalter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Dear Ichiro and all,<br>
<br>
Well, one thing I can think of is whether, for neumes on a staff, the notehead is visible. (Liquescent neumes without a clear notehead are, I believe, a predecessor to the plica.) If this were to be encoded, however, it could be an attribute on the <nc> rather
than a liquescent element.<br>
<br>
Micah<br>
<br>
<br>
> On 21 June 2018, at 11:16, Ichiro Fujinaga, Prof. <<a href="mailto:ichiro.fujinaga@mcgill.ca" target="_blank">ichiro.fujinaga@mcgill.ca</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Dear all,<br>
> <br>
> Currently (<a href="http://bit.ly/MEI_Neumes_0_2_3" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/MEI_Neumes_0_2_3</a>), a liquescent is encoded as a boolean attribute of <nc>: @liques<br>
> <br>
> On the other hand, episema is an element with its own attributes:<br>
> @form {vert | horiz}<br>
> @place {n | ne | e | se | s | sw | w | nw} (the placement of the episema with respect to the <neume> or <nc> with which it is associated)<br>
> <br>
> My question is whether liquescent should be an element?<br>
> <br>
> Do we need to encode different “forms” of liquescents?<br>
> Do we need to encode different placements of liquescents?<br>
> Or something else?<br>
> <br>
> Ichiro<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> mei-neumes-ig mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:mei-neumes-ig@lists.uni-paderborn.de" target="_blank">mei-neumes-ig@lists.uni-paderborn.de</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-neumes-ig" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-neumes-ig</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mei-neumes-ig mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mei-neumes-ig@lists.uni-paderborn.de" target="_blank">mei-neumes-ig@lists.uni-paderborn.de</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-neumes-ig" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-neumes-ig</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>mei-neumes-ig mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:mei-neumes-ig@lists.uni-paderborn.de">mei-neumes-ig@lists.uni-paderborn.de</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-neumes-ig">https://lists.uni-paderborn.de/mailman/listinfo/mei-neumes-ig</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>